In the investigation of the constitutionunder your consideration, great care should be taken, that you do not form your opinions respecting it, from unimportant provisions, or fallacious appearances. On a careful examination, you will find, that many of its parts, of little moment, are well formed; in these it has a specious resemblance of a free government — but this is not sufficient to justify the adoption of it — the gilded pill, is often found to contain the most deadly poison. You are not however to expect, a perfect form of government, any more than to meet with perfection in man: Under these impressions, it has been my object to turn your attention to the principal defects in this system.
Federalist What is a Federalist?
It was a title given to a group of people who believed in forming a stronger central government than the one that existed under the Articles of Confederation which were inadequate. Because of this, many of our founding Fathers felt we needed a stronger government.
These were aimed at the representatives of NY — to agree and ratify the new constitution. At the time, NY was a very big state, as well as politically powerful and economically wealthy. Anti-Federalists These individuals were on the opposite side of the Federalists, they did not want a stronger central government.
They were concerned the US would return to the same tyranny experienced in Europe. Anti Federalist papers The Anti-Federalist would reply to the Federalist papers — it was an open debate via the newspaper.
House of Representatives As the two sides, the Federalists and Anti-Federalists considered the requirements for the House of Representatives, they had to identify: Who should serve and how long should they serve as Representative.
They thought a person who was 25, 7 years a citizen of the US and at the time of the election lived int he state they were to represent and they should have to be re-elected every two years.
The Anti-Federalists were concerned that if someone served for 2 years, they could take advantage of their position. Some objected to election by the general population.
They were concerned that the people were too gullible and they wanted the State Legislature to select the State Senators and the Representatives. However, some did think the people should be able to provide their opinion, through identifying their choices for the position of Representative, but that the State Senators would select.
The Federalists argued back that these people could not constantly stand for re-election because they would not have an opportunity to really learn their position and what if there was some type of issue with their election — this could impact those whom they were to represent.
However, the Federalists did not want them to serve more than two years, for the same reasons the Anti-Federalists were concerned for more than one year. One of the most important features about selecting someone for the House of Representatives, is that this person should be known by a good number of people int he community they would be represented.
This helps keep them accountable. Today, because our population is bigger, it can be difficult to truly know our representatives.
However, the idea was to truly make this person very accountable to their local constituents. Whatever is legal in one state, is typically recognized to be legal in another state acts, legal proceedings. For example, your drivers license. Without the Full Faith and Credit Clause, you would have to get a drivers license in every state you wanted to drive in.
The same holds true for your marriage license. There are situations in same-sex marriages where the marriage license is not transferred.
This will be based on the vote of the people in the various states that have not identified marriage as being same-sex, but between a man and a woman.Representation of state is determined by population TYPES OF PEOPLE Each group published a series of letters known as the Federalist and Anti-Federalist Papers.
The Anti-Federalist papers objected to provisions of the proposed constitution while the Federalist Papers defended the rationale behind the document.
After the Constitutional Convention of had ended and the proposed Constitution had been submitted to the American people for ratification, public debates raged between those who supported the Constitution (Federalists) and those who opposed it (Anti-federalists).
Anti-Federalists Essay - Federalists vs. Anti-Federalists From the development of the American Constitution was a battle between two opposing political philosophies.
Free Essay: Federalist vs. Anti-Federalist The road to accepting the Constitution of the United States was neither easy nor predetermined. because the loyalty of the legislator will be first to the people of his district and then secondly to the benefit of the whole country. More about Federalist vs. Anti-Federalist Essay. The Conflict. The Anti-Federalists’ Representation of People - The Anti-Federalists had many views that were different than those of the Federalists. One the differences that seems to be important, is . The constitution brought division between two groups, the federalists and the anti federalists. The two groups certain philosophies. The Constitution caused numerous debates on the future of America and its structure. The anti-federalists have been concerned about the role of the national government and its dominance over citizens.
The very term, representative, implies, that the person or body chosen for this purpose, should resemble those who appoint them — a representation of the people of America, if it be a true one, must be like the people.
Better understand the nature and purpose of representation, and why, according to Anti-federalists, it would not be successful in a large nation.
Explain why Anti-federalists believed that eventually the extended republic would result in rebellion or tyranny. The Anti-Federalists believed that the representatives should represent all men, including the men of the lesser classes.
In Brutus Essay II it is apparent that the Anti-Federalists see the need for representatives to show diversity.